User talk:Green108

Sockpuppetry case

Block Request

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Green108 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. IPSOS (talk) 19:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Green108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to respond to an accusation of sockpuppetry, see below . There is no evidence to connect me to any other individual. I would like to see what the previous judgements were made on. I edit mainly on one small area of speciality of which I have personal experience BKWSU and have done considerable research. If you look at my edits, the vast majority over the last year have been firstly supplying academics references and then secondly grunt work cleaning them up into template form. I am being attacked by two members of the organisation Core Internet PR Team, the leader of which has stated outrightly that he is attempting to have me banned. See, below. Although I do not have the time to identify this right now, I think you will see from their contribs that they share a pattern of editing, reversion, personal attacks against me and that a disproportionate amount of effort has been putting into gaming the wiki against me. I feel bad that others editors are being brought into this. It is a narrow subject, views will be polarised. Any other unofficial editor will and have faced the "official" PR Team. I am slightly disadvantaged as I do not have the time to invest in all the wiki-lawyering, nevermind track what it is they are up to, and have focused mainly on research, production and maintenance.

Decline reason:

I've discussed the case with the admin who performed the checkuser and it appears solid. I'm sorry, but we're going to have to decline the unblock request. - Kylu 23:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sock puppet case; [1]

Deliberate attempt to ban; [2]

The two users are Bksimonb (talk · contribs) and Riveros11 (talk · contribs).

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Green108 appears to be relevant. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

I recommend you sit this out. A week or two is no big deal. Evading blocks through IP editing is seen as a problem in and of itself, and could lead to further sanctions on you. GRBerry 03:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Of course, your block will probably be extended to two weeks. Dumb. Don't you get it? IPSOS (talk) 01:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My block is relevant to the above case. If you have any problems with it, I suggest you take it up with User:Mackensen, as he is the checkuser who determined about the sockpuppetry. --w^L^{<speak·check>} 21:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

As GRBerry noted above, continued evasion of your block with IPs will lead to your account block being extended and may eventually lead to other sanctions such as a ban from editing. I don't know the specifics of your block, but I'd strongly suggest you take the week off before you incur more interruption of your editing privileges.--Isotope23 ^talk 15:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Wdivinedecree.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wdivinedecree.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bksimonb 08:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Cycle and Trimurti A4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cycle and Trimurti A4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bksimonb 08:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Brahmakumaris-cycle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brahmakumaris-cycle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bksimonb 08:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Woriginaltree.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Woriginaltree.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bksimonb 08:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use

The fair use rationale of the posters you uploaded doesn't reflect reality, that is, it is clearly not low resolution as claimed. Please consult an admin or experienced editor for advice on how to correct the fair use rationale. This isn't necessarily an attempt to pull down the posters from Wikipedia. It is just important that a fair use rationale is accurate. I'm sure you can resolve this. Thanks Bksimonb 08:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You posted on my talk page, "So.........if it is too big for you , why not just make it smaller?". My answer is yes, you go ahead, that will certainly address one issue. Also the comments you made such as this one about re-writing the organisation's history etc have absolutely nothing to do with fair-use rationale. If anything it goes right against the arbcom ruling where it clearly states, "Primary documents can be quoted in order to accurately describe uncontroversial items, but using them to illustrate controversial facts or conclusions is inappropriate." I've added this to the fair-use dispute tags.

How strongly you feel about your POV carries no weight in this situation and serves no purpose as a counter argument, if anything, it just shows a lack of understanding. Please just address the fair-use issues. That's all. I have no problem with the pictures staying once this is done.

Regards Bksimonb 06:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPA

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

The following comments are personal attacks in the form of accusations and attempting to discredit an editor on the basis of affiliation. You also accuse me of "dishonesty" which I personally find quite distasteful. If you persist in making such comments against me I will escalate this issue to conclusion. Although you talk about "the BK" it is quite clear you mean me since I was the only one raising the fair-use concerns. Your co-operation is expected and will be appreciated.

"BK want to remove images" [3]

"Bksimonb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is not being honest for their reason is wanting these images deleted."
"the contributor wants them removed is that they are a member of the Core Internet PR Team for the organisation involved, the Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University. "
"It has put great effort into attempting to own the topic page."

[4] [5] [6] [7]

Thanks & regards Bksimonb 12:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Green108, the template may be a little strong, but WP:NPA specifically classifies as a personal attack "Using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views". Please try to tone down your rhetoric. IPSOS (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Brahmakumaris-cycle.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Brahmakumaris-cycle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Papa November 16:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Cycle and Trimurti A4.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Cycle and Trimurti A4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Papa November 16:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wdivinedecree.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Wdivinedecree.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Papa November 17:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Woriginaltree.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Woriginaltree.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Papa November 17:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mrgreen.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mrgreen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ► 06:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mrgreen2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mrgreen2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ► 06:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]